Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 2671-4639(Print)
ISSN : 2671-4663(Online)
Journal of Animal Reproduciton and Biotechnology Vol.27 No.2 pp.87-92

Reproductive Performance according to Ovarian Status, Postpartum Uterine Treatment, and Calving Season in Estrus Synchronized Dairy Cows

Hyun-Gu Kang*, Ill-Hwa Kim, Woo-jae Choi
Veterinary Medical Center, Chungbuk National University


A study on estrus synchronized dairy cows using progesterone intravaginal device was done to classify each cow’sreproductive status from calving to synchronization and to evaluate the reproductive performance according to ovarianand uterine status, and calving season. From calving to estrus synchronization, silent heat or error of estrus detectionamong ovarian status and endometritis among uterine disorders were exposed in the most distribution (75.4% and48.3%, respectively). The pregnancy rate of cows with inactive ovaries was lower than those in the follicular and lutealphase. And according to the uterine status before estrus synchronization, the pregnancy rate was similar in threegroups; normal, endometritis, and pyometra (70.9, 69.1 and 100%, respectively). The interval from calving to conceptionwas shorter (p<0.05) in cows calved during autumn than in cows calved during spring and winter.

03 Hyun-Gu Kang.pdf183.4KB


 Dairy cow is economic animal, and its productive and reproductive performance is very important in order to maximize the income of the dairy farm. The factors affecting in productivity include the increased calving interval, abortion, dystocia and metabolic disorder. Ideal calving interval for high reproductive performance of dairy cows is 365 days (Houghton et al., 2000; Asimwe and Kifaro, 2007). The female beef cattle should be pregnant within 80~85 days to have 12-month calving interval.

 An increased calving to conception interval is correlated with a few factors, including the late involution of uterus (Short et al., 1990), inadequate nutrition (Spitzer et al., 1995; Morrison et al., 1999; Moreira et al., 2000; Wettemann et al., 2003), short estrous cycle (Short et al., 1990), calving season (Asimwe and Kifaro, 2007; Gebeyehu et al., 2007; Ansari-Lari and Abbasi, 2008), poor estrus detection (Son et al., 2001; Melendez et al., 2008), parity (Asimwe and Kifaro, 2007; Walsh et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2009), and high incidence of silent heat or subestrus (Kang et al., 1995). Causes of prolonged open days were housing management as error of estrus detection (Melendez et al., 2008), ovarian disorders as ovarian cysts, and uterine disorders as uterine involution, endometritis, and pyometra (Short et al., 1990; Deutscher et al., 1991).

 Rapid progress in genetics and management in the dairy industry has resulted in increased milk production per cow (Sakaguchi, 2011). Metabolic demands for more milk production negatively impact the reproductive function of postpartum cows (Beam and Butler, 1999). The exact detection of estrus is essential component of postpartum breeding programs that depend on overt signs of estrus for optimal timing of insemination (Alnimer et al., 2009; Roelofs et al., 2010). Consequently, postpartum dairy cow has a short estrus behavior, deferred commencement of ovulation and estrus expression, declined estrus detection, reduced pregnancy rate, and also increased postpartum anestrus and subestrus cow (Honparkhe et al., 2008). The inefficiency in estrus detection can increase the average interval between successive insemination to limits both reproductive efficiency and profitability. Timed artificial insemination (TAI) has been advised to overcome the problem of inefficiency estrus detection (Pursley et al., 1995; Martinez et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2005; Alnimer et al., 2009).

 Loyacano et al. (1974) demonstrated that the cows calved during the winter had higher conception rates than the cows calved during the summer, even though the body weight loss in the winter was larger than in the summer. Kim et al. (2009) reported that interval from calving to conception in summer was the shortest in four seasons in Korean Native cows. Melendez et al. (2008) reported that conception risk within season was lower during summer within the third period than during the rest of the seasons. The negative effect of heat stress on conception in dairy cattle, especially from the day of service to 6 d after breeding, is well established (Wolfenson et al., 2000; Morton et al., 2007).

 This study was carried out to evaluate the subsequent reproductive performance according to ovarian status at controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) administration, history of uterine treatment, and calving season in postpartum estrus synchronized dairy cows, using data collected over a period of 5 years.


1. Experimental Animals

 This study was performed from February 2006 through to April 2010 at two dairy farms located in Chungbuk province, Korea. The lactating cows were maintained in free-stall facilities, fed a total mixed ratio and milked twice daily. Cow were observed for the estrus condition twice daily. One hundred fourteen lactating Holstein-Friesian cows were selected as postpartum and postinsemination subestrus dairy cows for this study. Postpartum and postinsemination subestrus dairy cows were defined as cows were not detected estrus postinsemination or during above 60 days postpartum. All experiments were performed with the approval of the Animal Ethics Committee at the College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University (Cheongju, Chungbuk, Korea).

2. Estrus Synchronization

 All selected postpartum dairy cows were synchronized as described in modified CIDR-based TAI protocol (Kim et al., 2007). Briefly, treatment consisted of insertion of a CIDR device containing 1.9 g progesterone (CIDRTM   InterAg, Hamilton, New Zealand) with injection of 250 μg gonadorelin (GnRH; Fertagyl, Intervet, Holland) or 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) (SY Esrone; Samyang, Seoul, Korea; Day 0), injection of 5 mg PGF  (Lutalyse  Upjeon, USA) and removal of the device on Day 7, injection of 250 μg GnRH or 2 mg EB on Day 9, and TAI 17 h later. All hormone injection were intramuscularly administered. Pregnancy diagnosis was determined at 30 to 60 days after TAI using both ultrasonography and rectal palpation. Pregnancy rate per TAI was defined as the percentage  of cows confirmed to be pregnant in a single pregnancy diagnosis after one TAI.

3. Examination of Reproductive Tract

 The animal’s reproductive tract were examined by rectal palpation and transrectal ultrasonography (Sonoace 600 with a 7.5 MHz linear array transducer; Medison, Seoul, Korea). The ovarian status was classified into luteal or follicular phase, and inactive ovaries based on ovarian structures (corpus luteum, follicle, cysts, cystic wall thickness) by rectal palpation and ultrasonography. The cows with uterine disorders were treated by infusion of 100~150 ml povidone-iodine or injection of 5 mg PGF . before CIDR administration. The uterine status was classified into endometritis and pyometra based on echogenicity of the uterine cavity.

4. Statistical Analysis

 The reproductive performance items: number of conceived  cows on first service, days from estrus synchronization to conception, and interval from treatment to conception. The research items of this study: ovarian and uterine status and calving seasons. SPSS ver.12.0 was used for statistics analysis of these data. The ANOVA was performed for the analysis between calving seasons and 1) interval from calving to conception, 2) interval from treatment to conception, 3) number of cows conceived on first services. The reproductive performance according to ovarian, and uterine status before CIDR application were analysed using the chi-square. A probability level of p<0.05 was considered significant.


1 Incidence of Reproductive Disorders

 The incidence of reproductive disorders according to the ovarian status examined by rectal palpation and ultrasonography in 114 synchronized dairy cows was 86 (75.4%) in silent heat or error of estrus detection, 16 (14.0%) in inactive ovaries, 3 (2.6%) in persistent corpus luteum, 8 (7.0%) in follicular cysts and 3 (2.6%) in luteal cyst (Table 1). The incidence of uterine disorders was 55 (48.3%) in endometritis and 4 (3.5%) in pyometra (Table 2).

Table 1. Incidence of reproductive disorders according to the ovarian status in 114 synchronized dairy cows

Table 2. Classification of uterine disorders before estrus synchronization in 114 postpartum dairy cows

2. Reproductive Performance according to Ovarian Status

 The conception rate according to the ovarian status at estrus synchronization was shown in Fig. 1. The conception rate was 40.5 % (34/84 cows) on luteal phase, and was 42.1% (8/19 cows) on follicular phase. The cows with inactive ovaries had tendencies that conception rate was low as 36.4% (4/11 cows).

Fig. 1. Reproductive performance according to ovarian status in 114 synchronized dairy cows.

3. Reproductive Performance according to Uterine Status before CIDR Treatment

 In reproductive performance according to the uterine status before synchronization, the conception rate of cows was 70.9% (39/55 cows) in normal uterine status, 69.1% (38/55 cows) in endometritis, and 100.0% (4/4 cows) in pyometra (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Reproductive performance as to uterine status before synchronization in 114 dairy cows.

4. Reproductive Performance on Calving Season

 The results of reproductive performance according to calving season were shown in Table 3. The number of cows conceived on first service was relatively high in autumn and winter. The interval from estrus synchronization to conception in autumn and summer was the shorter than in spring and winter, but there was no significant different (p>0.05). The interval from calving to conception in autumn was shorter than in spring and winter (p<0.05).

Table 3. Reproductive performance according to calving seasons in 114 synchronized dairy cows


 The producers all over the world are likely attempting to reach a suggested optimal value of around 12 to 13 months (Radostites, 2001). This study was designed to demonstrate the correlation between reproductive status and reproductive traits at estrus synchronization, and the association between calving seasons and reproductive performance in estrus synchronization dairy cows. The reproductive performance was correlated with numerous factors, including the BCS (Dobson et al., 2008), parity (Stevenson et al., 1999; Tenhagen et al., 2004; Alnimer and Lubbadeh, 2008), calving season (Asimwe and Kifaro, 2007; Gebeyehu et al., 2007; Ansari-Lari and Abbasi, 2008) and reproductive disorders (Short et al., 1990; Deutscher et al., 1991).

 Roelofs et al. (2010) reported that the exact detection of estrus is an important factor for improving the reproductive performance of dairy cows. However, there is a limit to estrus detection by clinical estrus signs. Also, rapid progress in genetics in dairy industry result in increased milk production and shortened estrus behavior (Beam and Butler, 1999). Moreover, Asimwe and Kifaro (2007) cited the another factor causing prolonged calving interval was the negligence of heat detection. The CIDRbased TAI was developed to combat the problem of estrus detection (Alnimer et al., 2009).

 In investigation on the incidence of reproductive disorders according to the ovarian status in synchronized dairy cows, the incidence was highest in silent heat or error of estrus detection and endometritis (Table 1). This results indicate that estrus detection was the most difficult problem in dairy industry. The previous researchers reported that estrus detection rate was low as 38 to 51% (Senger, 1994; Stevenson, 2001; Washburn et al., 2002; Stevenson, 2005; Melendez et al., 2008). The best method to overcome the problem of inefficiency of estrus detection was progesterone-based timed artificial insemination (Pursley et al., 1995; Martinez et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2005; Alnimer et al., 2009).

 This study showed that there was significant correlation between calving season and the reproductive traits of synchronized dairy cows. The figures showed that the reproductive traits (the number of cows conceived on first service, interval from treatment to conception, and interval from calving to conception) of cows calved in autumn were shorter than those of cows in the other seasons in this study. A few researchers (Fallon, 1962; Loyacano et al., 1974; Deutscher et al., 1991) demonstrated that the calving season was closely related to the subsequent reproductive performance of cows. Deutscher et al. (1991) reported that the spring calved cows recovered their reproductive cycles earlier than the winter calved cows. In terms of pregnancy rate, Fallon (1962) found that pregnancy rate of the cows in the hot area was higher than that of the cows in the cold area. Loyacano et al. (1974) reported that the winter calved cows had lost their body weights, but pregnancy rates was higher than the spring calved cows. Montgomery et al. (1985) reported that later calving in photoperiod, temperature, and pasture availability influenced resumption of varian cycles.

 The conception rate according to the ovarian status at estrus synchronization and uterine status from calving to estrus synchronization was shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. The conception rate on luteal and follicular phase was relatively high (40.5 vs
42.1%), but that on inactive ovaries was low (36.4%). Nguyen et al. (2011) reported that a higher incidence of abnormal postpartum resumption of ovarian cyclicity leads to reduced  reproductive performance. Also, Gautam et al. (2010) reported that the days open of cows with delayed resumption of ovarian activity were greater than that of cows with normal resumption of ovarian activity. Postpartum uterine diseases such as metritis and clinical endometritis are common disorders of lactating dairy cows, that negatively affect reproductive performance (LeBlanc et al., 2002; Gilbert et al., 2005), thus diminishing profitability of dairy operations (Overton and Fetrow, 2008). Also, Uterine health disorders (Dubuc et al., 2010) and anovular lactating dairy cows (Bisinotto et al., 2010) have been associated with decreased first-service P/AI and increased pregnancy losses (Ribeiro et al., 2011). In the present study, the uterine status before estrus synchronization had no influence on reproductive performance after estrus synchronization (Fig. 2). After treatment of uterine disorders, CIDR was inserted into the cows with uterine disorders.

 The fact that we used only two herds may be criticized. Conducting more comprehensive research by using larger sample size and considering other potentially related variables are highly recommended. However, we hope our present study will provide a framework for such additional studies in the near future. 


1.Alnimer MA and Lubbadeh WF. 2008. Effect of progesterone (P(4)) intravaginal device (CIDR) to reduce embryonic loss and to synchronize return to oestrus of previously timed inseminated lactating dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 107: 36-47.
2.Alnimer MA, Tabbaa MJ, Ababneh MM and Lubbadeh WF. 2009. Applying variations of the ovsynch protocol at the middle of the estrus cycle on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows during summer and winter. Theriogenology 72:731-740.
3.Ansari-Lari and Abbasi S. 2008. Study of reproductive performance and related factors in four dairy herds in Far province (southern Iran) by Cox proportional-hazard model. Prev. Vet. Med. 85:158-165.
4.Asimwe L and Kifaro GC. 2007. Effect of breed, season, year, and parity on reproductive performance of dairy cattle under smallholder production system in Bukoba district, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19:1-9.
5.Beam SW and Butler WR. 1999. Effects of energy balance on follicular development and first ovulation in postpartum dairy cows. J. Reprod. Fertil. (Suppl.) 54:411-424.
6.Bisinotto RS, Ribeiro ES, Martins LT, Marsola RS, Greco LF, Favoreto MG, Risco CA, Thatcher WW and Santos JEP. 2010. Effect of interval between induction of ovulation and artificial insemination (AI) and supplemental progesterone for resynchronization on fertility of dairy cows subjected to a 5-d timed AI program. J. Dairy Sci. 93:5798-5808.
7.Deutscher GH, Stotts JA and Nielsen MK. 1991. Effect of breeding season length and calving season on range cow productivity. J. Anim. Sci. 46:1522-1528.
8.Dobson H, Walker SL, Morris MJ, Routly JE and Smith RF. 2008. Why is it getting more difficult to successfully artificially inseminate dairy cows? Animal 2:1104-1111.
9.Dubuc J, Duffield TF, Leslie KE, Walton JS and LeBlanc SJ. 2010. Risk factors for postpartum uterine diseases in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 93:5764-5771.
10.Fallon GR. 1962. Body temperature and fertilization in the cow. J. Reprod. Fertil. 3:116.
11.Gautam G, Nakao T, Yamada K and Yoshida C. 2010. Defining delayed resumption of ovarian activity postpartum and its impact on subsequent reproductive performance in Holstein cows. Theriogenology 73:180-189.
12.Gebeyehu G, Kelay B and Abebe B. 2007. Effect of parity, season and year on reproductive performance and herd life of Friesian cows at Stella private dairy farm, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19:1-8.
13.Gilbert RO, Shin ST, Guard CL, Erb HN and Frajblat M. 2005. Prevalence of endometritis and its effects on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Theriogenology 64:1879-1888.
14.Honparkhe M, Singh J, Dadarwal D, Dhaliwal GS and Kumar A. 2008. Estrus induction and fertility rates in response to exogenous hormonal administration in postpartum anestrous and subestrus bovines and buffaloes. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 70: 1327-1331.
15.Houghton PL, Lemenager RP, Horstman LA, Hendrix KS and Moss GE. 2000. Effects of body composition, pre- and postpartum energy level and early weaning on reproductive performance of beef cows and preweaning calf gain. J. Anim. Sci. 68:1438-1446.
16.Kang BK, Choi HS, Son CH, Oh KS, Kang HK, Kim SJ, Kim HJ and Kim NK. 1995. Progesterone assays as an aid for improving reproductive efficiency in dairy cattle. V. Plasma progesterone determination as applied to the differential diagnosis of reproductive disorders and judgement of treatment responses to PGF2α or GnRH treatment. Korean J. Vet. Res. 35:603-613.
17.Kim BH, Lee SK, Kim IH and Kang HG. 2009. The effect of parity and calving seasons on the reproductive performance of Korean native cows. J. Emb. Trans. 24:127-130.
18.Kim UH, Suh GH, Hur TY, Kanf SJ, Beak KS, Park SB, Kim HS, Kang HG and Kim IH. 2007. The effects of administering estradiol benzo progesterone during the growth or static phases of the dominant follicle in CIDR treated lactating dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 53:591-596.
19.Kim UH, Suh GH, Nam HW, Kang HG and Kim IH. 2005. Follicular wave emergence, luteal function and synchrony of ovulation following GnRH or estradiol benzoate in a CIDRtreated, lactating Holstein cows. Theriogenology 63:260-268.
20.LeBlanc SJ, Duffield TF, Leslie KE, Bateman KG, Keefe GP, Walton JS and Johnson WH. 2002. Defining and diagnosing postpartum clinical endometritis and its impact on reproductive performance in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2223-2236.
21.Loyacano AF, Nipper WA and Vincent CK. 1974. Effect of supplemental energy and season of breeding on the reproductive performance of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 39:281-285.
22.Martinez MF, Kastelic JP, Adams GP and Mapletoft RJ. 2001. The use of GnRH or estradiol to facilitate fixed-time insemination in an MGA-based synchronization regimen in beef cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 67:221-229.
23.Melendez P, Duchens M, Perez A, Moraga L and Archbald L. 2008. Characterization of estrus detection, conception and pregnancy risk of Holstein cattle from the central area of Chile. Theriogenology 70:631-637.
24.Montgomery GW, Davis GH and Hurrell GA. 1985. Interval from calving to first oestrus in autumn- and spring-calving herds in the same locality. Proc. Soc. Anim. Prod. 40:280-285.
25.Moreira F, De la Sota RL, Diaz T and Thatcher WW. 2000. Effect of day of the estrous cycle at the initiation of a timed artificial insemination protocol on reproductive responses of dairy heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1568-1576.
26.Morrison DG, Spitzer JC and Perkins JL. 1999. Influence of prepartum body condition score change on reproduction in multiparous beef cows calving in moderate body condition. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1048-1054.
27.Morton JM, Tranter WP, Mayer DG and Jonsson NN. 2007. Effects of environmental heat on conception rates in lactating dairy cows: critical periods of exposure. J. Dairy. Sci. 90:2271-2278.
28.Nguyen TC, Nakao T, Gautam G, Su LT, Ranasinghe RM and Yusuf M. 2011. Relationship between milk somatic cell count and postpartum ovarian cyclicity and fertility in dairy cows. Acta. Vet. Hung. 59:349-362.
29.Overton M and Fetrow J. 2008. Economics of postpartum uterine health. Dairy Cattle Reprod. Counc. Conv., Omaha, NE. Dairy Cattle Reproductive Council, Hartland, WI. pp 39-43.
30.Pursley JR, Mee MO and Wiltbank MC. 1995. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2α and GnRH. Theriogenology 44:915-923.
31.Radostites III OM. 2001. Herd Health: Food Animal Production Medicine. W.B. Saunders Company, pp: 276-278.
32.Ribeiro ES, Lima FS, Ayres H, Greco LF, Bisinotto RS, Favoreto M, Marsola RS, Monteiro APA, Thatcher WW and Santos JEP. 2011. Effect of postpartum diseases on reproduction of grazing dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 94(E-Suppl. 1):63.
33.Roelofs J, Lopez-Gatius F, Hunter RHF, van Eerdenburg FJCM and Hanzen CH. 2010. When is a cow in estrus? Clinical and practical aspects. Theriogenology 74:327-344.
34.Sakaguchi M. 2011. Practical aspects of the fertility of dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 57:17-33.
35.Senger PL. 1994. The estrus detection problem: new conceptts, technologies, and possibilities. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2745-2753.
36.Short RE, Bellows RA, Straigmiller RB, Berardinelli JG and Custer EE. 1990. Physiological mechanisms controlling an estrus and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 68:799-816.
37.Son CH, Kang HG and Kim SH. 2001. Application of progesterone measurement for age and body weight at puberty, and postpartum anestrus in Korean native cattle. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 63:1287-1291.
38.Spitzer JC, Morrison DG, Wettemann RP and Faulkner LC. 1995. Reproductive responses and calf birth and weaning weights as affected by body condition at parturition and postpartum weight gain in primiparous beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1251-1257.
39.Stevenson J. 2005. Breeding strategies to optimize reproductive efficiency in dairy herds. Vet. Clin. Food Anim. 21:349-365.
40.Stevenson JS, Kobayashi Y and Thompson KE. 1999. Reproductive performance of dairy cows in various programmed breeding systems including Ovsynch and combinations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and prostaglandin F2α. J. Dairy Sci. 82:506-515.
41.Stevenson JS. 2001. Reproductive management of dairy cows in high milk-producing herds. J. Dairy Sci. 84(E. Suppl.): E128-143.
42.Tenhagen BA, Surholt R, Wittke M, Vogel C, Drillich M and Heuwieser W. 2004. Use of Ovsynch in dairy herds-differences between primiparous and multiparous cows. Anim. Repeod. Sci. 81:1-11.
43.Walsh S, Buckley F, Berry DP, Rath M, Pierce K, Byrne N and Dillon P. 2007. Effects of breed, feeding system, and parity on udder health and milking characteristics. J. Dairy Sci. 90:5767-5779.
44.Washburn SP, Silvia WJ, Brown CH, McDaniel BT and Mc-Allister AJ. 2002. Trends in reproductive performance in Southeastern Holstein and Jersey DHI herds. J. Dairy Sci.85:244-251.
45.Wettemann RP, Lents CA, Ciccioli NH, White FJ and Rubio I. 2003. Nutritional- and suckling-mediated anovulation in beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 81:E48-E59.
46.Wolfenson D, Roth Z and Meidan R. 2000. Impaired reproduction in heatstressed cattle: basic and applied aspects. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 60-61:535-547.